Dewey Dunnington

I'm wondering how I should proceed here: I could update this PR to basically include two copies of the spec (one for fixed size list, one for struct) and note...

I updated the text of this PR to support both! This topic can and should get more discussion outside the realm of this one PR. A notable thing for me...

That's a great point...this image was mostly for eye candy on a full-screen presentation. I'll try a few things and see if we can get something together as a stopgap...

Yeah it's very bad. I'll play around with something else...maybe along the lines of GeoPandas - Pandas + Arrow?

Ok! How about: 

(At least as an interim one for the GitHub logo + website version of the spec)

Ah, that's a good point. We have https://arrow.apache.org/visual_identity/#regarding-unofficial-images (but I'll check internally too to see if there are any thoughts)

Hmm...according to https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/list/#logos it's probably not a good idea. Back to the drawing board!

We really should have an easy `StructArray$create()`. We have a binding for this in dplyr, which allows a workaround until we add this properly! ``` r library(arrow, warn.conflicts = FALSE)...

Probably related existing failures related to `head()` and the exec plan reader that should get fixed in this PR: - https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/3368026889/jobs/5586109693#step:10:3813 - https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/actions/runs/3368024633/jobs/5586105172#step:9:3813