Pablo Ruiz
Ideally we solve this issue, though from reading online forums I wouldn't get my hopes up. In any case, given that local Hardhat is giving the results ok, I'd say...
@VirtualRealEstate-VRE can you send me an email with more details? me[at]pabloruiz[dot]co
@AndrewBezold you are right. I added it as not to lose it and then forgot to complete the description. Just updated it with what they posted.
@adamdossa right. @Everhusk for checking so within Solidity it can be done like this: ``` function isContract(address _addr) private returns (bool is_contract) { uint length; assembly { //retrieve the size...
I guess that the idea is to at least give the KYC provider some quick info about the address. It would be up to them to decide if they don't...
Moved to V2 milestone
I believe you mean #47, but that refers to something else. Bypassing KYC provider vs having multiple KYC providers. Reopening but moving it to V2 milestone
The way I was thinking about this to keep it simple and not have to redo a lot of code was to modify Template.sol and Compliance.sol so instead of passing...
The problem with that is that if an admin can remove his own address, then there's the chance of locking everyone out of the contract and having no admin.
Maybe there could be a "voteToUnfreeze" function to revert the freeze. What do you think? There might be a bigger issue here. What's to stop shareholders from colluding to effectively...