Artur Maciag

Results 105 comments of Artur Maciag

@diogobaeder thanks for the report. Tbh I don't know how to implement this atm

jsonschema must get support for v2020-12 draft first https://github.com/Julian/jsonschema/issues/782

Here's depndency matrix proposal OAS | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.1 ---|---|---|--- python | 2.7+ | 3.7+ | 3.7+ jsonschema | 2.x-4.x | 3.x-4.x | 4.x+ openapi-schema-validator | 0.1.x-0.2.x |...

`bytes` was supported because not strict type checking. With new version that shouldn't be the case with new Request protocol.

Hi @spaceone yes you're right, example and examples are mutually exclusive > Example of the parameter’s potential value. The example SHOULD match the specified schema and encoding properties if present....

Hi @Origin1227 Yes it [supports](https://github.com/p1c2u/openapi-core/blob/master/openapi_core/templating/paths/finders.py#L62). It was done recently with path patterns finder #202 It's merged to master but still not released

Why allow prerelease? What's the reason? Version [0.3.0](https://github.com/p1c2u/openapi-schema-validator/releases/tag/0.3.0) was released already.

openapi-spec-validator 0.4.x works with openapi-schema-validator 0.2.x only https://github.com/p1c2u/openapi-core/issues/296#issuecomment-1020239222

Hi @valentijnscholten you can check DRF usage in the test for DRF https://github.com/p1c2u/openapi-core/blob/master/tests/integration/contrib/django/data/djangoproject/testapp/views.py

`openapi-spec-validator` was released with versions `0.3.3` and `0.4.0`. Is it still the case?