Roman
Roman
Not finished with review yet - please ignore comments for now
Moved to linear: https://linear.app/osmosis/issue/STABI-68/fix-pricing-issues-where-token-out-value-is-greater-than-token-in
I did some investigations. The closest I could get is being able to set breakpoints in the `web` package only with the following configuration: ``` { "version": "0.2.0", "configurations": [...
I think we are so deep into relying on this helper everywhere now, making the refactor be not worthwhile in terms of time
Ref: https://github.com/osmosis-labs/osmosis/issues/6122#issuecomment-1729491325 cw pool incentives are not well-defined at the moment so we might not need this effort
I'm going to move this out of the volume-splitting feature since we decided to avoid pursuing CW pool gauges for v20. Instead, keep this in the icebox
V16 scope discussion: Agreed to push to v17. Still good to have, don't want to block v16 on this and cause scope creep
What I would like to know is how much uosmo does it cost to create say 10000 and 100000 incentive records? Is that linearly scaled gas value economically significant?
@pysel please edit issue to share context and acceptance criteria