Oscar Campbell

@kirbyfan64 @vendethiel - both you! ;-) Probably better to stay with C++11 that is widely implemented though?

I like the `[1..

Really looking forward to this! I've never coded C# and never will, so that kind of keeps me from contributing (apart from lack of time and deadlines yesterday ofcourse ;)...

Just curious if this is abandoned, or if progress is being on made on this point? Cheers

Ok, I see, thanks for swift response, and a cool project!

Yeah, I really don't like the completely extraneous "fn". I've thought further on the syntax also; While ``` identifier(some-arg : some-type...) -> return-type body ``` has a natural flow, another...

> Given the 'fn' keyword being there i'd wondered about leveraging it a bit > more e.g. maybe distinguishing 'fn' and 'proc' for pure vs side effects? > safe vs...

Too me, the `->` is the most natural and clear indicator of a function there is. Something "turns into" something else. `(a, b) -> c`. That's why I'd like to...

> I realise haskell has a way of splitting the parameter types & parameter names across 2 lines, thats' an interesting solution to this problem. Yeah, basically, you define the...

@curimit - sorry if there is a bit much of "general language discussion" here that is off topic from SugarCpp. It just kicks off the inspiration you know :)