Claudio Wunder
Claudio Wunder
I also believe that this proposal got split into two (on what eventually became the "Metadata Proposal", which indeed is not "i18n" anymore).
cc @mhdawson @nodejs/next-10 @Trott
> Is the idea that this would work on the current nodejs.org as well as on nodejs.dev or is the vision here that the nodejs.dev tech/build stack replaces what's on...
> Can we try to determine which parts of this can be done incrementally and which need to happen all-at-once? I'm trying to understand how many steps are involved here....
> I wonder if 20.x and forward is more realistic than 18.x and forward. I wouldn't complain if we got this working sooner than 20.x though. Indeed, I was trying...
### Proposal Updates I'm going to update the main proposal adding the following missing sections - How Navigation would be structured and generated (The order of each item, their titles...
> Build process: include a way to generate the doc from source? To generate part of doc ? Generate whole doc ? Pdf too ? (Maybe better to discuss about...
> l (e.g. multiline strings is non-intuitive, the type guessing makes it that sometimes one mistakes a string for a number, etc.). Gladly that none of those apply to our...
> Other markup languages, such as e.g. TOML or JSON, do not have those problems. I'm not saying those are deal breakers for using YAML, or that we should not...
@mhdawson @Trott I just updated it :)