Olga Shapoval

@EZoni Thanks for this PR! Looks good to me!

Hi @GivenChen. With @RemiLehe we have tested and concluded: - without filtering: everything works as expected; - with filtering: there is a bug in WarpX: filtering is not taken into...

Thanks a lot @SchroederSa for reporting the issue! I have just rerun your script with the latest `dev` branch and I do not observe discrepancy between `x` and `y` polarizations...

Hi @SchroederSa I ran two simulations using dev branch with `x`- and `y`-polarized lasers. For example, ``` 1) laser.polarization = 1 0 0 diag1.file_prefix = pol_x/openPMD ``` ``` 2) laser.polarization...

> @oshapoval I think we can remove the files associated to the class `PsatdAlgorithmJConstantInTime`, since the Galilean equations have been moved to a separate file, do you agree? @EZoni Yes,...

Hello @HollyHuddle Can you try to rerun your simulaiton by adding the following specification to the spectral solver set up and see if it is stable: ``` warpx.grid_type = collocated...

Hi @JustinRayAngus. I am hitting an error when trying to compile on GPU. Did you mean `is_tangent_to_bndy[icomp][idim] = ...` instead of `is_tangent_to_bndy = ....` in lines [823](https://github.com/BLAST-WarpX/warpx/blob/2395fc6c1323575efb8821ae93f8f36af1e14261/Source/BoundaryConditions/WarpX_PEC.cpp#L823), [828](https://github.com/BLAST-WarpX/warpx/blob/2395fc6c1323575efb8821ae93f8f36af1e14261/Source/BoundaryConditions/WarpX_PEC.cpp#L828C13-L828C31) and [830](https://github.com/BLAST-WarpX/warpx/blob/2395fc6c1323575efb8821ae93f8f36af1e14261/Source/BoundaryConditions/WarpX_PEC.cpp#L830)...