Oscar Gustafsson
Oscar Gustafsson
Oh, now I get it a bit more. I think raising an exception is not correct for the case of `And(Eq(..), Eq(..), Eq(..))`, so this must be checked before raising...
I know that there are some cases in the Wester tests, typically, `x**2 + y**2 < 1` to keep things inside a unit circle. It can also be that one...
That is what I am also saying. If if only contains Eq and And it means that each Eq is for a given variable (that should be checked as well)...
What I am saying is that it is the solution that should determine if it can be a dict, not the problem. Inequalities can go into problems that results in...
I guess there are two things here: 1. Add/modify an example in the gallery to illustrate how it is used. (Will be easier for the reviewers to get an idea...
An option may be to make these keyword only. This will introduce a smoother translation path, but take longer time. Once they are keyword only, the order doesn't matter... (So...
I reviewed #28754 before realizing that there was a discussion in the original issue. My suggested approach was to detect that the slope was explicitly given and in that case...
I do not disagree that checking for 0 should be enough. But hard to tell if there are corner cases where one would like to avoid small numbers. My rationale...
The check was added in #18647 without any discussion (as far as I can see), so hard to tell why.
First, `**kwargs` is the Python way to write "an arbitrary number of keyword arguments". So you may as well write: ``` ax.set_xticks((0,1,2,3), list('0123'), fontsize=20) ``` A problem is that `fontsize`...