Onur R. Bingol

@Opioid I am not sure if it helps but have you tried defining `BLOSC_USE_STATIC_LIBS` and `OPENVDB_USE_STATIC_LIBS` before the `find_package` calls?

> If I understand the documentation correctly, you use the Euclidean distance summed across some arbitrary evaluation points, is that correct? Yes, and this is not a 100% correct method...

> when is 6.X expected to be released? As soon as possible if I can find more time to work on it.

@ebo thanks! The story behind 6.x was just to separate visualization component from the core library and make the classes a little bit thinner. It was supposed to be released...

According to the NURBS book, it is not always possible to remove a knot as the authors assume that `num`-th derivative must be continuous to remove `num` number of knots....

> In this particular test, I explicitly insert a knot and then try to remove it. Since I inserted the knot, I think it should be possible to remove it...

@portnov you are right. For your specific case, if we want to remove `knot = 0` instead of `knot = 0.5`, it shouldn't allow it. I've implemented a fix and...

The approximation algorithm in the NURBS Book requires the number of control points to be generated. My personal approach was to make it simple by setting the number of control...

For the symmetric example, setting `ctrlpts_size` seems to fix the issue. I haven't checked the knot vector directly. ``` import numpy as np import geomdl import geomdl.fitting as fit import...

Ah! When the number of control points is degree - 1, then it is a Bezier curve. My mistake... The problem reappears when I increase the number of data points....