openreview-py
openreview-py copied to clipboard
Official Python client library for the OpenReview API
Instead of assuming all review notes will have a rating, confidence and review field, make the names of those fields constants at the top of the file. For example ECCV...
Since we started using the library fuzzywuzzy, I have been noticing this warning: /anaconda2/envs/py36openreview/lib/python3.6/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11: UserWarning: Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning I have noticed this warning...
This issues is related to https://github.com/openreview/openreview-py/pull/572 where Celeste found that: Both desk reject and withdraw process functions fail when reveal_authors=True and reveal_submission=False
There's no license on the repo or on the [API Documentation](https://openreview-py.readthedocs.io/en/latest/api.html) which respect to how the data from the API can be used. I would like to use the API...
the same for other stages that require to have the blind submissions. Otherwise the PCs get confused and the process functions fail.
There are certain groups, like Paper../Reviewers where the members of the group shouldn't be readers of the same group, otherwise we can break the anonymity.
Otherwise it keeps old data
Says "Select all user groups that should be able to read this comment." when the readers cannot be selected.