permitdata.org
permitdata.org copied to clipboard
open-data-standards
:hammer: A website for the BLDS Data Specification
Several jurisdictions have had trouble mapping to these standard values. We should revisit how to approach this and make this field not required.
Jurisdictions will have inspections that are not subject to a pass/fail, we should consider adding a value such as 'Done' or 'Completed'
Some feedback from some jurisdictions is that we should considered adding 2 status for the mappings: - Permit Expired - the permit has been issued but construction is not complete...
We have been working for a while on a spec along the same lines as permitdata.org at [openpermit.org](http://www.openpermit.org). So far we have focused more on operational data rather than just...
@axtheset - Additional data that should be considered could be the _permit applicant_ and _property owner_, both are data many jurisdictions make public about permit applications.
Perhaps `Area` or `TotalArea` to make it a little more readable? Also consider being able to specify alternate units if the standard is used outside the US (metric system). /cc:...
Add a note to the relevant sections of the standard indicating that abbreviations and other special terms / phrases be clarified in the fields where "raw" information is presented. This...
The specification document could benefit by more closely following the structure of other conceptually similar data standards, such as https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs/reference. Start with title, version number (less than 0 for draft...
Metadata
Owner
Metadata
:hammer: A website for the BLDS Data Specification