Onur Ülgen
Onur Ülgen
The problem should be fixed now. You should be able to run the actions.
> @onurulgen As mentioned earlier - I am finally able to allocate some time to NiftyReg. > > Looking at differences between this branch and master, it appears some discrepancies...
**The symmetric scheme isn't supported for these classes:** - [x] reg_nmi_gpu - [x] reg_ssd_gpu - [x] reg_optimiser_gpu - [x] reg_conjugateGradient_gpu **CUDA implementations needed:** - [x] CudaCompute::GetDefFieldFromVelocityGrid() - [x] CudaCompute::ApproxLinearEnergy() -...
We can't put into Content since it fills AladinContent with unnecessary stuff. I'll reorganise Content classes as 
> Morning @onurulgen, > > I was writing a test for the NMI gradient computation and found out that measures have to be initialised with a F3DContent. I think that...