Olof Kindgren

Oh, I see what you mean now. I thought you meant down the tree. Up the tree makes more sense. There are probably still some things to work out, but...

Thank you for this. I agree with most of what you say, and you're absolutely right that library management can be improved a lot. I'm right now prioritizing this bug...

FYI, fixed 3 and made fusesoc init slightly safer

I'm beginning to agree with you. We need to tell the user to run `fusesoc init` so we could just tell them to run `fusesoc library add --global fusesoc-cores https://github.com/fusesoc/fusesoc-cores`...

Thanks for kicking off this discussion. There are several things being talked about here, but for the most basic task I think we are all on the same page. I...

Oh, and regarding fusesoc init, until there's a remote API that FuseSoC can talk to, I think it makes sense to have an easy way to initialize the standard libraries

Also just realized I had already discretely opened an issue for this https://github.com/olofk/fusesoc/issues/269 :)

I agree and I have tried to improve this a couple of times. IIRC there are some that are a bit more tricky since they don't have the context of...

Yes, it's a bit tricky but it can probably be improved. I don't want to introduce tool types again (e.g. build, sim, lint) as they caused a bit of a...

Yes! I've been thinking the same thing. Happy to accept a patch for that. Also have another related idea about allowing to specify filesets, parameters and similar inline in a...