Olivier Giniaux

For now I see two options: ### Option 1: Make `GxHash` only use 128-bit SIMD, with a derived version `GxHash_VAES` using 256-bit SIMD Given the quite constraining VAES requirement for...

After the latest tweaks I was able to squeeze out a little more performance while still passing all tests. It would be difficult for me to make it any faster...

I just pushed one more optimization (still passing the SMHasher tests ofc). I also took the opportunity to run https://github.com/tkaitchuck/aHash since it was advertised as "the fastest, DOS-resistant hash currently...

Hi @rurban, while finalizing my work on gxHash64 I noticed very different timings from my benchmark setup compared to the SMHasher speed test. For instance, I get worse performance for...

See PR #80

Awesome! Here is an example of what it looks like with the PR (we have been testing this fork on our end). This UI is from [Grafana Tempo](https://github.com/grafana/tempo) but it...

Nooo haha I just did this, so I was really happy to see your PR. Didn't had time to check it yet however

> To print stacks from top to bottom I still have to do a revert (line [132](https://github.com/ogxd/dr-dotnet/compare/stack-utils...pstacks-refacto?expand=1#diff-614c046db28ea6befe6a988590961e63847b4e7ea7b979609732eb3bd37078b9R132)) as the do_stack_snapshot method gives us methods_ids as a stack (to read from...

Hi @Shadercloud. Thanks for the issue. I don't actively maintain this repository. Don't hesitate to file a PR if you've fixed it yourself It looks like a floating point rounding...

Hi @vborovikov , No this is not possible currently but it would be a good addition for the DrDotnet desktop version 🙂