Theodore Watson

@MadlyFX if you end up finding a good solution, please send a PR - sounds like it would be a handy feature! One other thing to consider is it could...

@bakercp the PR looks good to me - going to leave one comment in there - but otherwise good to merge. I think it is also okay to use glm::pi...

@ofZach I think the PR could get merged and we could work on a better user facing solution? ( I don't think #defines for PI etc in a global namespace...

Jumping back to the namespace thoughts Constants in the of namespace `of::Pi` `of::HalfPi` `of::TwoPi` More nested `of::Math::Pi` `of::Math::HalfPi` `of::Math::TwoPi` `of::Math::Lerp(src, dst, 0.2)` Unity style ( note this is sort of...

Good point @roymacdonald ! Wondering though if `of::PI` prevents us from holding onto the macros at the same time? ie: will `of::PI` and `PI` clash if we don't remove the...

Not 100% sure its needed, but if it makes it easier to manage fine with it. 👍

ping @danoli3 @julapy

Be great if people could add any open issues not listed above to this - either in the comments or by editing this issue.

Bitesized Pull Requests would be great! Especially starting with stuff which is easy to review and merge. People can then review the PRs in a more focused way. Thanks!! Theo

> @dimitre that would be great for make! Thanks!!