Oliver Dunbar

Don't worry, they are not lost, Everything should have been put in here https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1T3wXWv0tc6O4YuN-7OxMDtezV61RXcUO6DP-eOCXnUc/edit#gid=0

Deal with #300 here too - [x] Update `Base.show` for function distributions

- [ ] As everything is stacked internally, we should provide an API to obtain the evaluation point grid, for easy reshaping (if we are plotting for example).

 This shows the parameter file content (As we know, whether we still do a "distribution of parameters" is WIP and depends on how the different model components will be...

1. Lets keep the defaults in CLIMAParameters as 1 file for now. In the end it may break up naturally, this is easy to implement later, without modifying any interfaces,...

Still, regarding point 1. I would still argue for just 1 file for now - as this partitioning is maybe not so clear yet until we have everything together.

For NN weights, would it be easier to save these to file and just provide the file name to clima as the parameter?

I think that the EKP tools are working fine. I'm confident that the issue is that **the data is uninformative about the osmotic coefficient**. Thus the inverse problem can only...

PS Here is one with the prior mean increased to 2.0 (spread 0-100) or with prior mean decreased to 0.1 spread (0-5) In all these plots the covariance-weighted data-misfit was...

@trontrytel any movement on this one?