odersky

@smarter It turns out that Dimi's attempted hylolib port had lots of problems with ambiguities, and they all went away with #19395, which includes this PR as the only change...

Sorry, I misread. Yes, of course #19395 will be a SIP. I'd be OK with this fix being a line item, except that I think it would be important to...

@WojciechMazur We are considering merging this change for 3.5. Can we run an open CB to see what the damage would be? In the small CB it only caused one...

Ah yes, thanks for reminding me. I think the results will be similar now. On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:39 PM Wojciech Mazur ***@***.***> wrote: > I've run the...

To give more time to the failing projects, we now delay the rollout of the new scheme: 3.5: old scheme but warn if there will be changes in the future...

Was that after [d10019d](https://github.com/scala/scala3/pull/19300/commits/d10019dc56723d7ab35e4ad234e39e3be29e7660) was added or before?

@WojciechMazur I think I told you to test the wrong PR here. Sorry! Instead of #20277 it should have been this PR to be tested in the open CB. #20277...

@WojciechMazur Unfortunately I got the wrong PR again (I forgot to force push the local changes). It was still the version that enabled the change only for 3.6. So, can...

Thanks for the analysis! > However, these projects only fail to compile under -source:3.5-migration (default mode of compilation used in OpenCB) - if we remove the flag all of them...

One question: The tooling people said they want to be notifed of any changes to syntax before the syntax is rolled in. Did that happen? @tgodzik @gabro are you aware...