Oliver M. Crook

Great, thanks for the feedback Johannes. Will implement the above suggestion and find out the best naming. This will sit in my `IonMobility` package for moment. Cheers!

@jorainer Just in case your interested other have recommend `IonMobilityTime`, there are two reasons for this. FIrst, some convert these units to cross-sectional collisions in Native MS so specifying time...

@jorainer I have highly accurate isotope distributions and background proportions if you need them and so code to simulate the isotope distribution given the sequence

So currently, I'm using, for example 12C and 13C that their masses are `c(12.0000000, 13.0033548378)` and their proportions are `prob = c(0.9893, 0.0107)` etc. I can then take any sequence...

Yep, exactly, mine is more simialr to envipat, just it returns a spectra object so its easier to use. Though, would also be cool in your unsupervised approach to be...

interestingly, `do.call` works. Is `concatenateSpectra` in the devel version?

I also have performance issues here, so following this.

yep, I'm using that to join the quant MS data with the ID MS data - its very good but still slow

Faster than cbind definitely. I'll do some profiling

Hi there, This looks great! I think there a only a couple of way to improve the code: - [] The package versions aren't aligned across Description file and NEWS...