obadiaa

Just a comment it's a good thing we don’t seem to be categorising the Eminence exploits (like this one https://etherscan.io/tx/0x3503253131644dd9f52802d071de74e456570374d586ddd640159cf6fb9b8ad8) We have these two txs in our db but aren't...

*drops mic*

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x7461f9261d1f50adaafca7377642b70504094f235ffd6c85113df1556e80f43a this one tx is categorized as profit of ~$100k USD when it just seems like a 1Inch swap? in our db, revenue is 625,303,946,340,502,100,000 🤔

I'll have more soon but all these are Flashloan-based, MakerDAO-loan opening based arbs we classify in our db as 0 revenue when I don't believe they are 0x448b94d1eed3449d7427f769341d7789474a2db60820b9ed9c494af0ae6b049c 0x0fa6b5afa4d1f6452692d2b780ae3baee04c5911a17a8b9154b332756e69a997 0xbbda18fc7191da4d52bbba0713adcbecca7c9ff6cb4b14db609ff556a2a9601d...

another zapper address: 0x80c5e6908368cb9db503ba968d7ec5a565bfb389

Aren't there still arbs in these txs? Like the very first one looks like they walked off 33k USDc after reimbursing their DyDx flashloans?

We classified this arb as 865k revenue https://etherscan.io/tx/0x2d346682871ecb407ee25af4de2b9998e70b4621116acafae7e07b6b79f585e3 when it's a 0.13 ETH profit (~103$). We seem to have overlooked the loan from DyDx that's taken and repaid Another example...

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x8b89589c6afb0e7a6e11afe04efa21312e078764986b692ef7b4c76f3f28ceef this is 0x exchange proxy we've classified as $289k revenue when it looks closer to (942-321)$ revenue, not sure why

https://etherscan.io/tx/0x21bdb4fffb209d6f7f0a28df5cfd6b8f736bc5ad529a1d33eba0c661476d826e this is an arb of profit ~1ETH classified as $217k in our db, it looks like we ignore either the first or second step of ETH transfer to either...

Scott has created this Metabase question (https://dashboard.flashbots.net/question/27) joining a new db he's created that classifies self-destructs with our own db mev_inspections. The resulting question is a list of Inspect txs...