Omar Antolín Camarena
Omar Antolín Camarena
That sounds very cool, @hmelman! And it's also exactly the type of thing I hope people start using Embark for. Well, people have started, for example @jaor has some code...
> another command that could typically be bound to the same key with an additional modifier Think of `RET` as a postfix modifier. 😛 So if you bind `embark-act` to,...
> > Think of RET as a postfix modifier. stuck_out_tongue So if you bind embark-act to, say, C-,, then C-, RET is your "I'm feeling lucky" button. > > Note...
I believe `pcase` was added to Emacs about 8 or 9 years ago, @hmelman. 😛
I had a vague recollection of that reddit conversation. :) I'm glad you found it. Probably a defcustom for the sort order is warranted.
Ouch! Since I don't often use the verbose indicator I hadn't noticed how unwieldy it has gotten. Ultimately I think the paradigm of listing a bunch of stuff and having...
> While I agree that search (completion) is more useful than browsing, browsing is useful to see what the capabilities are to try to learn to use it more. I...
Mmh. What about a simplified keymap grouping: just put a blank line before the bindings found in `embark-general-map`? Maybe with "Specific actions" and "General actions" headings? In @hmelman's screenshot, the...
> Yes, that would work too. But why not just add a line for every keymap inheritance? A *line* is fine. Making up a heading for each keymap in the...
I still don't have a good solution to this, but it lead me to discover other cases that don't work, like those `//` shadow paths (I was missing a `substitute-in-file-name`).