Emilio Nyaray

Since LUTs are about voltage control we should probably implement the eeprom-based display-size validation as there might otherwise be a risk that we basically allow users to tell the screen...

Changing `start_link` this way would make it behave in a non-standard way, which could lead to confusion. I can see the value of being able to query an Inky process...

Just to clarify what I meant in our slack conversation... it is probably enough to change the magic numbers into module attributes, so that they are compile-time inlined but still...

> just duplicate those attributes that the tests need I guess. To not over-engineer things. This!

Agreed, I'll put it on hold until that is the case or someone requests it.

Does this include #9?

Sounds good, agreed.

It would allow the driver to work while the display renders. (I know this is kind of a BS feature, just wrote it down for fun, hehe)

The former. To clarify, I think that `TestHAL` and `TestIO` probably should be migrated to being Mox-based instead, in order to _not_ use something I whipped together in a weekend...

Flipping the rotation shouldn't do anything with your display, the default rotation is 0, I'm not sure why you're seeing a flipped rotation have an effect. Have you verified that...