nvaprodromou

I agree it's not quick and easy - sorry for that. May be the result of copy/paste between filing PRs. Or maybe I grossly misjudged the effort needed. I forget...

@sparticlesteve @memani1 Should we form a task force for this so we can get some dedicated time and faster progress? Otherwise we are only opportunistically discussing the subjects whenever we...

I'm available to meet at any time for this, as we believe it's critical for the HPC benchmark to move towards this direction.

Since we haven't had an issue with it, why not formalize it? Sounds like we just need to add a paragraph in the policies document. I think a formal guarantee...

TTT sounds good too. Aligning with MLPerf-Training on it is a good idea as well.

Differentiating from MLPerf-T should not be sufficient justification for policy development. It is true that this will blur the line between MLPerf-T and MLPerf-HPC even more. But the truth is...

I don't think we can get any formal guarantees on this. I did ask this question myself as well and I can dig into it some more. But I doubt...

Thanks for the feedback. I'll respectfully disagree with a couple of the points made, but first, I do agree that it's valuable as a fallback for failed submissions in some...

@TheKanter I'm not just focusing on the results display, but rather the overall overhead open division adds when reviewing/discussing/presenting results. As far as open division itself, nothing has changed really....

The comments focus primarily on the technical correctness of the proposed rules. I would like to remind all of us that we set a goal to increase participation, competition, and...