ntysdd

Thanks, that's good to know.

These articles may help. [x64 exception handling](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/exception-handling-x64?view=msvc-170) ``` rex_push_reg reg Saves a nonvolatile register on the stack using a 2-byte push, and emits the appropriate unwind information (.pushreg reg). Use...

> [@shawnlaffan](https://github.com/shawnlaffan), I think this is a problem caused by the `-std=c99` in ccflags. The module builds and installs fine on StrawberryPerl-5.38.x and earlier. But, for whatever (if any) reason,...

@sisyphus @shawnlaffan See this link. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/C-Dialect-Options.html GCC has options like "-std=c23" and "-std=gnu23". They differ in that ``` For example, -std=c90 turns off certain features of GCC that are incompatible...

So in "c17" mode, the `asm` keyword is not usable, it must be written as `__asm__`. But in "gnu17" mode, the `asm` keyword is directly usable as a GNU extension.

I think this is (almost) impossible to solve. X87 does not have a "pow" instruction, it only has FYL2X and F2XM1, which can be used to calculate pow. And x87's...

@halibobo1205 That is to say, if you want consistency, use StrictMath.pow(). Math.pow() doesn't always return the same results, even on x86. Quote https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4232231/whats-the-difference-between-java-lang-math-and-java-lang-strictmath > The Javadoc for the [Math](http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Math.html) class...

First post there https://github.com/dlang/dmd/discussions/15029#discussion-4995797

Regarding this issue, I'm considering using this assembler as a backend assembler for C (or some other language). C's reserved words differ from those in assembly language, making it challenging...