Neil Lewis

@gaelforget Quick question: do you have an intuition for whether or not the additional changes you've made (i.e., beyond those in Jamie's branch) would affect compilation on Mac setups for...

@gkvallis Yes the code is still time-stepping to a solution, using the same leapfrog method as used by the full GCM. On each timestep, convective adjustment, radiation and other physics...

@sit23 Hi Stephen, thats my fault. In `column_initialise_fields` the import `get_grid_domain` from `transforms_mod` needs to be changed to the same subroutine import but from `spec_mpp_mod`. I think I didn't catch...

If I push a change to my branch will this make its way through to the P/R?

@sit23 My latest commit should fix this. Thanks for testing. Unfortunately you might get a few more of these, as it seems to have revealed that not all of my...

@sit23 Ok, all should work now. All instances where `transforms_mod` was being used have now been replaced with imports from `spec_mpp_mod` and `column_grid_mod`. There is however a PROBLEM. When I...

I have two follow up comments: .F90 turns on a C-like pre-processor which enables #define statements. Second is to change `rrtm_radiation.f90` to `rrtm_radiation.F90` I think I should use `git mv...

@sit23 Done :)

@lqxyz @sit23 Ok, so it seems you're right about the flag. But, as you've discovered, it is already included in the Isca compilation. It seems like `-D` flags aren't being...

@jamesp Would the sensible thing be to just hand the same flags to the compiler for both `.F90` and `.f90`? As @lqxyz as pointed out, the `-cpp/-fpp` for gfortran/ifort should...