ewan
> Is this in 2.0 or 1.4.x @zaknafean 1.4.x
> remove `.type` from `object` on line 736 & line 751 Those probably worked in the past. I think I'll officially take on the maintenance of this plugin. There are...
The layer system will now work, I opened a pull request. Though it may be late.
> This needs some tests to validate that it even works. @IGI-111 I added to the tests in `forc-test` as this directly tests the self impl feature in sway projects....
I've removed the test from `forc-test` and added a test contract `contract_abi_auto_impl` to `test/src/e2e_vm_tests/test_programs/should_pass/test_abis`, in it there's a unit test to ensure the anonymous abi is usable. I also renamed...
@IGI-111, after doing some digging with the tests, I figured out that the `std` dep is needed for this, else the test fails. also there's a test contract `should_fail/self_impl_contract` that...
> Would be possible for the Abi to be named as the project is in Forc.toml? Probably changing the case to upper camel case. @xunilrj so I tried using the...
> I think the best solution is to create a new field at `Context` something like `anonymous_contract_name`, that can be filled at the start of the parsing with the best...
i’d love if you created another pr, thanks
can i take this task?