noresttherein
noresttherein
I must add that it certainly is not always so and I tried to provide a minimized example without success, but these things, depending on the history of changes, are...
This must be my personal record: smallest example and three days of narrowing it down from my project :.(
Yes, I realised when I narrowed it down to this line. The stack trace being full with variance checks, for quite a bit it didn't even occur to me that...
It gets better! ```scala type Type[T] = T { type X = Type[T] } //StackOverflow ``` On the other hand, ```scala type Type[T] = T { type >: Type[T]
So, is this going to be integrated to master in some form? What is the current obstacle to do so?
> The PR trivially adjusts the malicious `from`. It would be nice if we had some sort of tool to verify that the collections satisfy a set of "laws" of...
I think it is still wrong: `Seq(1).indexOfSlice(Nil, 1)` should probably return `1`. It does for `List`. ```Scala if (from0 > l) -1 //non strict else if (tl < 1) from0...
I think that it is one thing is to be lax about the arguments you accept, and quite another to be lax about the values you return. At least it...
Oh, I'm sorry then. I kind of get an idea why, although in the era of IDEs being smart, but not enough, occasionally IntelliJ decides to import something moronic even...
Yes, importing it locally in the object doesn't produce the behaviour even in 2.13.