norbjd

Hello :wave: Thanks for reporting the issue. The linked PR should solve this. After the reviews are done, we'll release a new version with the fix!

Hello @korridor, a new version (0.4.2) have been released and fixes this issue. Tell us if you are still facing this issue and we'll reopen it.

Hello :wave: Thanks for reporting the issue. The linked PR should solve this. After the reviews are done, we'll release a new version with the fix!

Hello @korridor, a new version (0.4.2) have been released and fixes this issue. Tell us if you are still facing this issue and we'll reopen it.

> LGTM. Is there any way of testing this? I guess we don't have a private registry to use in the integration tests? @Shillaker I've added an integration test in...

Hello :wave: Thanks for your contribution! However, there is no difference by making your handler `async` in the context of Scaleway functions. Both the existing handler and your handler (with...

@gkurz Sorry about the late answer, I'll try to remove the option and see if it still works :smile:

It indeed works without `kernel_irqchip=on` on `q35` and `microvm` machines. But I don't know if this create regression, since I don't understand why `kernel_irqchip=on` was set on the first place...

@paulbors of course editing the spec is possible (and that's the solution we used now), but this is not very convenient if the openapi evolves : we have to manually...

@consultantleon @nikosmoum @skwasniak I am not sure how you got a complete composite object. I've tried **with the example in my first post**, using the latest versions at the time...