Nathan Nutter

``` $ lxc-checkconfig --- Namespaces --- Namespaces: enabled Utsname namespace: enabled Ipc namespace: enabled Pid namespace: enabled User namespace: enabled Network namespace: enabled Multiple /dev/pts instances: enabled --- Control groups...

I'm running current versions: ``` $ lsb_release -rc Release: 15.10 Codename: wily $ dpkg -l lxc | grep lxc ii lxc 1.1.5-0ubuntu0.15.10.3 amd64 Linux Containers userspace tools ``` Since it...

I've started trying to [prototype](https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-image_build/compare/master...nnutter:environment) this to see if it's possible. P.S. Most of the changes are aesthetic and can be discarded if not desired.

A coworker noticed [AIP-161: Field masks: Wildcards](https://google.aip.dev/161) is accepted as of March and satisfies this issue. What is the process it will take to get from AIP to defined here?...

@elharo Go. Go made a change, https://github.com/golang/protobuf/issues/1179, based on the language in [field_mask.proto](https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/9b0fa3e7fbaf3463c3afa1c9ab111682108eeadb/src/google/protobuf/field_mask.proto#L85-L86), > // A repeated field is not allowed except at the last position of a > //...

> Is there anyway to pass the --proto_path option when using the docker container? Looks like [`entrypoint.sh`](https://github.com/pseudomuto/protoc-gen-doc/blob/master/script/entrypoint.sh) passes along args so should be able to just pass them in to...

Thanks @dsnet and @cybrcodr. I've created a feature request over there, https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/8547.

Cross-posting this on the upstream issue and re-opening. A coworker noticed [AIP-161: Field masks: Wildcards](https://google.aip.dev/161) is accepted as of March and satisfies this issue. What is the process it will...

@neild I agree with @puellanivis, I do not follow how merging with field mask would address my concern. --- @puellanivis, I thought [Protocol Buffers Version 3](https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/docs/reference/proto3-spec) removed the `optional` keyword....

@neild I'm also curious about the API breadth concerns. I am no protobuf expert at all but I kind of thought the binary format was irrelevant/orthogonal. As an example of...