nistor

Here are some performance numbers using an increment of routes: ``` NumberEntered: 0 NumberRejected: -1000 NumberAccepted: 1000 NumberMerged: 910 NumberReturned: 90 TimeToProcess: 0.37775897979736 NumberEntered: 0 NumberRejected: -2000 NumberAccepted: 2000 NumberMerged:...

I had let a 100k prefix one run as well, here's that result: ``` NumberEntered: 0 NumberRejected: -100000 NumberAccepted: 100000 NumberMerged: 91192 NumberReturned: 8808 TimeToProcess: 869.71707892418 ```

We had used a previous implementation to aggregate v6 blocks in another project which I had replaced the aggregator there with this one since it wasn't quite fully aggregating in...

I've got some updated results condensed: ``` NumberEntered: 1000 TimeToProcess: 0.35671091079712 NumberEntered: 2000 TimeToProcess: 0.99436402320862 NumberEntered: 5000 TimeToProcess: 4.0280168056488 NumberEntered: 10000 TimeToProcess: 13.002596139908 NumberEntered: 25000 TimeToProcess: 62.700823068619 NumberEntered: 50000 TimeToProcess:...

I've pulled down the latest file and tested, here are the new numbers: ``` NumberEntered: 1000 TimeToProcess: 0.38982105255127 NumberEntered: 2000 TimeToProcess: 1.193638086319 NumberEntered: 5000 TimeToProcess: 4.0424168109894 NumberEntered: 10000 TimeToProcess: 13.068011045456...

did you take a quick look at the one I had previously noted, wondering if there's an idea there that could be used to help speed things up.

hey, hope all is well with you! Wondering if you've had any more time to take a look to see if there's anything that could be done to improve the...

hi! Hope all is well :) Just wanted to ping you find out if you've had any ideas or a chance to see how we can speed up the aggregation...

Hello everyone - is there still someone working on this particular enhancement? This would be super useful.