Ivo Bellin Salarin
Ivo Bellin Salarin
@jonparrott which is the problem, more precisely ? Le 17 févr. 2017 5:54 PM, "Jon Wayne Parrott" a écrit : > @jstephenson we're looking into this. As > a heads...
hi! it would be great to have this merged - possible?
I did this! (before posting the issue) in fact I am able to run the ggml-org version with CoreML support. But I am getting segfaults when running this python wrapper....
This issue should be labeled with `infra` (not sure about `type: feature`, this is why I didn't select that template - sorry).
Linking [the branch containing the workflow](https://github.com/nilleb/cpython/tree/feat/infra-has-pr), in case.
Thanks a lot for sharing the link to #540!!! Apart from the fact that I don't agree with https://github.com/python/core-workflow/issues/540#issuecomment-2143911590 because this does not match the reality The proposed workflow matches...
The script is here: https://gist.github.com/nilleb/112f2dc55c14c9ed3b0809a1801d48fb, I implemented it before the workflow. I mentioned it in the description, without linking it, because it will stress the GitHub API (at scale) way...
What is the process to discuss the _if_ ? I have the feeling that the discussion on #540 was stuck about one year ago. I would prefer not to let...
I am sorry, but I do not get what is wrong with the workflow or the bedevere update. A dashboard will never be up to date if it is disconnected...
The proposed workflow removes the label for abandoned or closed pull requests; and a label is not the same as the "linked pr" concept.