Results 606 comments of Niko Matsakis

@RalfJung I updated the text to read: > It may be possible to weaken the validity or safety invariants later, but we risk finding that people have written unsafe code...

Hmm, I think we should move the discussion about whether people can/will say "accept anything that meets the validity invariant" somewhere else, as I think it's independent of this particular...

Removing nomination as this is in FCP and was discussed at prior lang team meetings.

OK, so this FCP is complete. The question is, what do we do now to close the issue? :) Option A. Edit the reference or perhaps necronomicon. Option B. Edit...

My two cents-- I think the approach in this PR seems *fine*, but I think we should have a link from wherever blocks are documented saying "labeled blocks are described...

@Jules-Bertholet can you elaborate on what is enabled by this trait? The RFC says > Data structures and containers that wish to store unsized types are easier to implement if...

r=me but I think we should do a crater run

@petrochenkov that sounds like a blocker for stabilization, right? (If so, I'll add to the OP)