Nils Goroll
Nils Goroll
bugwash: yes, we want to tighten the check Todo: write the code
@dridi thank you for this interesting perspective! Too bad that your initiative did not get further yet. I have two questions on your comment: * Would it really make sense...
@dridi thank you. Regarding the `URL` type, I get your point regarding `.path`, `.query` etc (I want `.param(name)`), but still I think `.encode()` should be a method on string-ish. `URL`...
Oh, @dridi, after my first impression of your idea being alternative to the suggestion herein, are they not actually complementary? ```vcl sub vcl_init { new percent = codec.string(URL, LOWER); }...
> If a `percent` attribute or method already existed then name it differently?
@dridi at least we have `import ... as ...`
@bsdphk @dridi I do not understand what the point would be about not printing the backtrace. Why would we need VSM complications just to not enable printing it?
> in the VUT case it might be better to make back-traces opt-in or opt-out with environment variables. I agree with "if configurable, then through environment variables". But my question...
bugwash: send to syslog (suggested by phk), enable always
@asadsa92 is this ready? If yes, would you please rebase+squash?