Nic Holthaus
Nic Holthaus
it shouldn't be too hard for me to prototype and find out. I'll give it a shot.
@Morwenn So I implemented this in my 3.0 dev branch and it's working really nicely, good call on your part. It's actually really making me want to improve the math...
In v3 you can specify your own base dimensions arbitrarily, they just need a name and an abbreviation. see here: https://github.com/nholthaus/units/blob/v3.x/include/units/core.h#L1117 On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:55 AM Kunal...
You're on the `v3.x` branch right? Just so you know, that branch is (intentionally) _very_ unstable right now, and has a few planned refactors (including unit type names) that may...
#150 or one of the other PRs made us a lot more sfinae friendly right? If not I don't think we'll do this for 3.0.0
If you're willing, totally. Can we add CI check for conformance? On Thu, May 10, 2018, 10:25 PM Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña < [email protected]> wrote: > Would you like me...
Once you write the format, I'll do the CI integration.
yup. What a "unit" actually was changed quite a bit over the library development, leading to everything having essentially the same name. Now that the scope is more clear, I...
we don't have an implicit conversion to `chrono` types?
So i have a file/class that I almost always copy around as a companion to units called `timestamp` ([this gist, units 2.3](https://gist.github.com/nholthaus/ffe0984f5ab86d41efe24ac133c39144#file-timestamp)). I wrote some of it in the gist...