Nikola Forró

I've opened https://github.com/packit/specfile/issues/231. After that's implemented, we can fix the packit code to work with all %changelog sections without breaking the spec file.

Hi, thank you for your request. I'm wondering, how would this work? You would configure the override job for the first package in the chain, so that `koji_build` jobs of...

Ok, so, if I get it correctly, `pkg_a` would have `koji_build`, `bodhi_override` and `bodhi_update` jobs, and `pkg_b` would have `koji_build` and `bodhi_update`. I see two issues here: - `koji_build` of...

> You cannot submit updates for builds that are in on-demand side-tags separately (i.e. they don't even show up in the bodhi web UI when you search for them). They...

How about introducing a new trigger for `koji_build` and `bodhi_update`? Let's say that package C depends on packages A and B. Config for packages A and B: ```yaml jobs: -...

> One comment is that I'm not sure the second `tagged_packages` in package C's config is necessary. The `koji_build` for this package going into the side-tag should be sufficient to...

Well, there can be a package that has a runtime dependency on updated version of another package. So yes, in that case there is no need for a side tag,...

Tasks to implement: - [x] https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2377 - [x] https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2378 - [x] https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2379 - [ ] https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2468 - [ ] https://github.com/packit/packit-service/issues/2412

> * The concern is if those comments would leak in %autochangelog According to the [documentation](https://docs.pagure.org/Fedora-Infra.rpmautospec/autochangelog.html#changelog-entries-generated-from-commit-messages), only the first line of a commit message is added to the changelog, following...

> There is also an `upstream` link on Pagure:  Unfortunately it seems it's not available (nor modifiable) via API :slightly_frowning_face: