Fix bcftools stubs to behave like program

[fellen31]

This PR fixes issues where the stubs doesn't behave like the program would.

I.e. running bcftools with --output-type u/b --write-index=tbi, it still outputs a csi index, but were outputting a tbi index in the stubs:

• --output-type v --write-index=tbi - error
• --output-type v --write-index=csi - error
• --output-type z --write-index=tbi - tbi index
• --output-type z --write-index=csi - csi index
• --output-type u --write-index=tbi - csi index <- note
• --output-type u --write-index=csi - csi index
• --output-type b --write-index=tbi - csi index <- note
• --output-type b --write-index=csi - csi index

It takes the custom function added for bcftools csq in #6605, together with a similar function for the index, and applies it to the applicable modules.

PR checklist

Closes #XXX

• [ ] This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
• [ ] If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
• [ ] If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
• [ ] If necessary, include test data in your PR.
• [ ] Remove all TODO statements.
• [ ] Emit the versions.yml file.
• [ ] Follow the naming conventions.
• [ ] Follow the parameters requirements.
• [ ] Follow the input/output options guidelines.
• [ ] Add a resource label
• [ ] Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
• Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
  • For modules:
    • [ ] nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile docker
    • [ ] nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile singularity
    • [ ] nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile conda
  • For subworkflows:
    • [ ] nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile docker
    • [ ] nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile singularity
    • [ ] nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile conda