Add module `muse/call` and Dockerfile
PR checklist
Closes #5621
- [ ] This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
- [x] If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
- [x] If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
- [x] If necessary, include test data in your PR.
- [x] Remove all TODO statements.
- [x] Emit the
versions.ymlfile. - [ ] Follow the naming conventions.
- [ ] Follow the parameters requirements.
- [ ] Follow the input/output options guidelines.
- [x] Add a resource
label - [x] Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
- Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
- For modules:
- [x]
nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile docker - [ ]
nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile singularity - [ ]
nf-core modules test <MODULE> --profile conda
- [x]
- For subworkflows:
- [ ]
nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile docker - [ ]
nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile singularity - [ ]
nf-core subworkflows test <SUBWORKFLOW> --profile conda
- [ ]
- For modules:
The Docker image still needs to be pushed to the nf-core registry, then I can update the paths accordingly. Also relates to #5629
Could this tool be added to BioConda? Then the other containers would be generated automatically
I opened a PR: https://github.com/bioconda/bioconda-recipes/pull/47957
If that works, I will change the files in this PR accordingly
I asked here: https://github.com/wwylab/MuSE/issues/31 Will wait for their reply and merge afterwards :)
@SPPearce I added the .bai files alongside the .bam building ontop of the answer I got from the developers. Do you think its ok like this?