update hmtnote
PR checklist
This PR removes the _annotated suffix added to output files by default.
- [ ] This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
- [ ] If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
- [ ] If you've added a new tool - have you followed the module conventions in the contribution docs
- [ ] If necessary, include test data in your PR.
- [ ] Remove all TODO statements.
- [ ] Emit the
versions.ymlfile. - [ ] Follow the naming conventions.
- [ ] Follow the parameters requirements.
- [ ] Follow the input/output options guidelines.
- [ ] Add a resource
label - [ ] Use BioConda and BioContainers if possible to fulfil software requirements.
- Ensure that the test works with either Docker / Singularity. Conda CI tests can be quite flaky:
- [ ]
PROFILE=docker pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd --git-aware - [ ]
PROFILE=singularity pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd --git-aware - [ ]
PROFILE=conda pytest --tag <MODULE> --symlink --keep-workflow-wd --git-aware
- [ ]
I think the conda test may have failed temporarily, and rerunning might fix it.
@ramprasadn , are you able to update this as I can't?
I believe the issue lies in hmtnote's conda recipe using a post-link script to fetch an online database, which is currently down causing failures during installation. On the other hand, docker and singularity images of hmtnote already include this database locally and work without issues. I am considering having this tool exclusively run using docker and singularity containers, rather than conda.
I believe the issue lies in hmtnote's conda recipe using a post-link script to fetch an online database, which is currently down causing failures during installation. On the other hand, docker and singularity images of hmtnote already include this database locally and work without issues. I am considering having this tool exclusively run using docker and singularity containers, rather than conda.
That is an option, if we can't get it to work on conda.
@ramprasadn , do you have time to take a look at this?