nessita

> @charettes I didn't say just merge it and not discuss it. I was told my pr was closed because I did it wrong and that my effort was unacceptable...

> fwiw this patch appears to break calls to `.get_cache_name()` since the mixin's `NotImplementedError` version is not overridden any more: > > ``` > ../sentry/src/sentry/db/models/base.py:124: in is_field_cached > name =...

> > > that's an annoying barrier to entry, can you file one for me? > > > > > > It’s not a very high barrier. Log in with...

@smithdc1 I'm going thru pending PRs that were on my "maybe 5.1" list, I wanted to double check that this is not yet ready for a re-review (given the ticket...

> Hi @nessita it is quite close. However, I'd not worry about getting this in ahead of the feature freeze. > > Let me update the versions and have a...

> @nessita Do you think we could merge that work now? Thank you Claude for the nudge, I'll re-review later this week! (currently dealing with release blockers and security reports).

> What is the status here, what is left to be done and how can I help? Are only the tests missing? For this PR to show up in the...

> Thank you for sharing the links. > > I think this [comment](https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-686-make-utf-8-mode-default-round-2/14737/15) from Steve Dower makes me believe this is the right thing to do. > > > One...

Hey @hrushikeshrv, we've been busy with the Django 5.1 Alpha release but I saw you forum message, since it got no answers I will try to get to this when...

Hello @marianaasilva! Thank you for this work :star2: This PR needs some code style fixing (see CI errors). Once you solved those, please unset the relevant ticket flags following [these...