Loïc Blot

interesting idea, you expect the client to be launched connecting to this server then, but currently we need authentication, an intermediare form is required to set the authentication on the...

i also agree with you can provide the same api on CSM it should not be a big deal to add to this PR :)

hmmm what's the purpose of this ? should it doesn't permit to call any abritraty C call at a point and then trigger security issues ?

My 50 cents, i put it in touch like every roadmap * better enties, with more intelligent API to transfer actions from server to client. We should not have for...

remember that SDL 2 is lower level than irrlicht. I tried it for personal purposes and it's harder to use than irrlicht, but yeah it works another thing, is SDL...

i just tried to bind SDL with our irrlicht 1.8.4 standard but it's not possible currently as far i see. We need to have some deeper changes on irrlicht to...

> There's already a patch available to use Irrlicht with SDL 2. It should be merged shortly before 1.9 is released. See [this post](http://irrlicht.sourceforge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51348#p297879). > > Too bad none knows...

do we need to continue to support irrlicht directly or make our own fork as there is only one developer and the quality/time of the release is very... slow ?...

it's my goal yes, i think having the feedback from @rubenwardy @sfan5 and @SmallJoker around this initiative can help a lot to see if i should continue in this way....

@SmallJoker currently it's more code removal than other, because SDL calls are shorter than calling the X11 API directly. For the MR part on MT itself it should shorten the...