Rene Saarsoo
Rene Saarsoo
While that would be doable, it results in code that has an obviously auto-generated look. But the goal of Lebab is to produce human-readable ES6 code. I think the better...
Named function expressions are currently ignored to keep the transformation safe in case of recursive functions like: ``` js obj = { foo: function foo(n) { return n === 0...
This looks like a useful transform to have. It should also consider all the other differences of ES6 classes from `React.createClass`, as documented in [React docs](http://facebook.github.io/react/docs/reusable-components.html#es6-classes): - No `getInitialState()`, instead...
Hi @iosluoyang, Lebab does not do any React/JSX transforms like converting `React.createClass` to `extends React.Component`. The JSX support which @mohebifar referred to is that Lebab no more crashes when it...
Thanks for the report. Please include a code snippet which you're trying to transform, that causes the crash.
Having received no further information for several months, I'm closing this.
Thanks for reporting. Looks like yet another bug in the class transform.
This is essentially the same issue as #113 (I closed that one, and changed the title of this one, as I think it better describes the issue). The only guidance...
Would you be interested in implementing this?