Neil Chadwick

Can we please discuss the name *ObservationSupport*. I am struggling with this. It is not intuitive. When people in the UK see the *support* then are immediately thinking about excavation...

@dponti I think you are on the right track here - certainly the ORF - SamplingActivity - MaterialSample - Specimen - Observation logic looks right (but we need to keep...

There is a big difference between how we handle **surface water bodies** vs **groundwater bodies** in terms of: - visualisation - analysis I think that aligns with @dponti. What I...

*I struggle slightly with the difference between geotechnical model and geotechnical synthesis model. Some of the following may be addressing the latter.* (1) Determine geometry of geotechnical model Get geometry...

I was starting with a fairly general overview. On (1), in practice even if we have a 3D model at source, it is usually only practical to work in 2...

See my comments under issue #10

Some good discussion so far. This subject is more difficult that it looks. Some advice based on our experience with AGS... In the AGS format we have the concept of...

I agree with the initial comment from @LucasoilCloud that we are perhaps focussing too much, at this early stage, on the precise definitions of things. We should be focussing on...

I re-iterate that I think that attempts to categorise all of our investigation holes/tests/things into object superclasses like borehole, pit, sounding etc. are misguided, and will only cause trouble later....

Good that we have this - this subject area can be tricky to deal with. Water tables and piezometric surfaces do have an unnerving tendency to move up and down,...