Nic Cope

Thanks for chipping in everyone! I just took another pass at running the conformance tests against https://github.com/crossplane/provider-aws/commit/84acbf60bd68f2f7527c36dc3d23e955261bd932 with: * Some tweaks to the conformance suite per https://github.com/crossplane/conformance/pull/24 * A few...

> Is it possible to mark them conformant after making sure they work when you apply the steps in comments of the example YAML? Or do we have to have...

I think I know what you mean, but it would be useful to be explicit here. Currently: * Distribution conformance tests are completely automated. * Provider conformance tests are _mostly_...

Thanks @pdettori! I'm working on the conformance suite this week and will let you know once there's something ready to test out.

Hi @pdettori! We'd love for you to be one of the first providers to submit a conformance request. The instructions are now available at https://github.com/cncf/crossplane-conformance/blob/main/instructions.md. Is this something you'd be...

Thanks @pdettori for this great feedback - and thanks also for being a guinea pig for this process. > I did follow the instructions to extract the report in ./results,...

@pdettori Ah - got it. That makes sense. Yes, we require Crossplane providers to install v1 CRDs. This is because we want the definition of a [structural schema](https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/extend-kubernetes/custom-resources/custom-resource-definitions/#specifying-a-structural-schema) to be...

@hasheddan Thanks for opening this! I notice there's an empty `README.md` file - is that intentional?

@turkenh gave this a shot and found a few bugs that we'll need to work through in order to make the provider conformant: > I am blocked with `provider-azure` conformance...

CC @sttts - this makes big changes to the realtime compositions implementation.