Nedim Salkić

@arboleya great idea on `AssembleConsolidationTx`. Why don't we make it `AssembleConsolidationTxs` instead? The node can return a list of transactions that it calculates to be the optimal for consolidating UTXOs...

> Can you please specify another change about adding a new utxosNum: Int property (or similar) in the balances endpoint that lets consumers know if a given asset is suitable...

TODOs: - [ ] Prepare two transactions ahead of time - [ ] Make sure the second one can be submitted successfully and that it's dependent on the UTXOs of...

> E2E tests are [failing](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-ts/actions/runs/13942637373/job/39023267335?pr=3741#step:5:182). IIRC, pre-confs should not be in 0.42.0. > Please, clarify what's going on, work around it, and report back. @arboleya I did the fix upstream...

@maschad Thanks for the approval! Still, given that this parser is public-facing as well, we realized that we need to test its outputs independently also. Although it satisfies our needs...

[https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-ts/pull/1597](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuels-ts/pull/1597) is a related alternative which, at the time, was closed due to lack of a majority in favor of it. A revisit of it might be worthy.

The `demo-*` projects haven't been touched in a long time while the `templates` are under a lot of development currently. Perhaps moving just the demos while keeping the templates in...

Superseded by #3508

Blocked by: - #1356 That PR introduces `WalletConfig` for testing with `launchTestNode` and this issue should be done after it's merged.

Resolved in #1356.