Ned Batchelder

I can see the value of parseable output from `coverage debug config`. I don't think I'd want to add a way to select the section to output though: once you...

Hi, thanks. Could you provide some explanation of what problem this is solving? I thought there was an issue written about this, but I can't find it now.

Do you have any more information about what caused the conflict? This is the type of change that can hide useful information about a problem to be fixed. I see...

@jdiego Thanks for the pull request. Could you explain how it makes the reports better? And it seems like there will be some needed clean up if we're going to...

Thanks, I don't often get contributions to the C code! Sorry it's taken me so long to respond. Do you have a way to reproduce the problem this is fixing?...

Sorry, this has taken a while to get to. Thanks for providing a test! But I tried running the test without your fix, and it didn't fail. Does it fail...

Ugh, I'm sorry, I forgot you had fixed this problem. I fixed it in a different way for https://github.com/nedbat/coveragepy/issues/1150. Does it solve the problem for you?

The tests are currently failing with: ``` Traceback (most recent call last): File "/Users/ned/coverage/trunk/.tox/py36/bin/coverage", line 11, in load_entry_point('coverage', 'console_scripts', 'coverage')() File "/Users/ned/coverage/trunk/coverage/cmdline.py", line 827, in main status = CoverageScript().command_line(argv) File...

Thanks for fixing the error. I don't understand why the indentation is off though? When I run this on coverage itself (with `ARGS="-e py36" make clean metacov metahtml`), I get:

Sorry I've left this for so long: as I understand it, the goal is to mark docstrings as executed if doctest executes them? I'm not sure what hooks doctest gives...