(pian)

thanks for having a look @nle-odoo I'm going to contact the person raising this issue, to get the actual problematic number, cause now I see that this seem like forcing...

### Existing Behavior https://github.com/odoo/odoo/assets/33809926/09eefeb6-ca3a-4c69-a87d-ed514d20becd ### Solution 1: Raise an error https://github.com/odoo/odoo/assets/33809926/4e331b80-af45-45f8-af9c-f5fb08666ee9 ### Solution 2: Blacklist unblacklisted https://github.com/odoo/odoo/assets/33809926/88d1d8ce-344b-4d77-8ae3-d5a676605dad ## Last Solution (unarchiving on the spot) got accepted by Product Owners -...

## Fix moved: from the new onchange method to the create method (which make more sense cause you don't want to unarchive records every-time you change number field on the...

Thanks for review @nle-odoo ## Refatoring add/remove In https://github.com/odoo/odoo/pull/158923#pullrequestreview-1991620737 you suggested simplifying the logic of add/remove methods. I agree that there is some redundancy. I managed to refactor `add` and...

applied RETH suggestions, rebased

Added preserving the original order of numbers requested to create

@tde-banana-odoo can we merge it ?

@tde-banana-odoo :eyes:

@robodoo r+