Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
> I think it might be wise for the command to refuse this unsafe configuration. It might merit a warning but please don't make it an error (or hide it...
I left the help text unchanged, since \ (which is also a toggle) is described in the same singular way.
...I also just noticed ‘c’ is undocumented in the man page. Will add it tomorrow. :zzz: Edit: I'll write something once the approach taken here is approved.
Hm. This user would find that supremely unintuitive. :smile: More objectively, that behaviour would be predictable (and IMO useful) *only* on static process trees that don't spawn new children once...
> new children aren't tagged (and probably shouldn't be?) I mean: it wouldn't cause any nasty surprises when killing, since you're killing the parent anyway, but it might when you're...
@Explorer09: Yes, I agree?
Hm. That *is* not good. As noted above, I don't want to make this too context-dependent. But... maybe it would make sense to only treat a tagged process with no...
Hi @Mic92! Since issues on your fork are disabled I'm responding here. There's already a similar maintained fork at https://github.com/teleshoes/acpi_call. Have you reached out to them at all? (They also...
Wow. That was fast. Thank you both! :smiley:
The bug isn't distribution-specific, but I use & first encountered it on Guix System.