Nik Cubrilovic

Thanks @aleith - i'll take a proper look at this after we get the current release out tomorrow

> The facility names in OpenNEM are not consistent with the registered facility names in the CER database, certainly for many of the FF generation facilities in WA that I've...

We should probably merge #100 into here and just have a general issue for facility data quality including capacities, close dates and emissions. There is a closure data parser in...

> or "15/Oct/2022" or what? ISO 8601 format - the database has closure date down to a full datetime, so it would be: `2022-10-22T00:00:00+10:00` In python to check: ```python In...

I'm wondering if we want to track the difference between _expected_ closure date, and _actual_ closure date @simonhac

If the specificity of the date is only down to a year or month would default to the first of any year/month - it's a major pain otherwise to store...

Hey there! ACK > only returns 8927 data points for the first data element. This shouldn't be happening as there is a Pydantic validator to check that the numbers match...

> i've often wanted a non-specific date type that allows YYYY, YYYY-MM, YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM-DDTHH, YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM and YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS etc. This is a problem in a lot of projects. Way I previously...

#129 is the validators that validate all responses

> > i've often wanted a non-specific date type that allows YYYY, YYYY-MM, YYYY-MM-DD, YYYY-MM-DDTHH, YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM and YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS etc. > > This is a problem in a lot of projects....