Darren A. Natale

Results 210 comments of Darren A. Natale

Proposal for a new `activity_status`: probationary

@cthoyt the discussion took place during the Ops meeting because this issue was tagged for discussion there. As for elaboration, from memory: 1) Several people expressed a desire to keep...

Update fp-013-notification.md

@matentzn @cthoyt I'm at a loss as to what happened here. It looks like a huge number of commits were made to my branch by people other than me. I...

Update fp-013-notification.md

I'm not sure what process to restart. This branch began because I needed to edit a file and couldn't (at the time) figure out how to do it on the...

Principle #16 maintenance - automated validation

Issue got a bit off track, closing.

EWG action: review auto-validation for Principle #20 Responsiveness

See also #1059 for choyt's suggestion regarding this principle.

NTR: 'has gene template' to replace either 'gene product of' or 'has gene product' (difficult to tell)

This all comes from work I did over a dozen years ago but never published, wherein I modeled what amounts to the 'central dogma' of biology, allowing for the necessary...

NTR: 'has gene template' to replace either 'gene product of' or 'has gene product' (difficult to tell)

From RO meeting: 1) Should create a plain English definition, with the more involved text as editor's note. 2) domain & range? Could be problematic due to issues surrounding 'gene'...

NTR: 'has gene template' to replace either 'gene product of' or 'has gene product' (difficult to tell)

@dosumis @cmungall I'm not really clear what the nature of the objection is. I mean, in addition to the already-noted one that it is too complex (I'm working on simplifying...

NTR: 'has gene template' to replace either 'gene product of' or 'has gene product' (difficult to tell)

On further reflection, I suspect the objection is because of statements like this: (2) if a is an amino acid chain and b has_bearer some RNA, then a has_gene_template b...

Features for classifying an ontology - replace reference vs. application

Yep, I still disagree. I'm not sure what it is about the new page organization that allows us to distinguish reference vs application. Indeed, since this is really a policy...