Darren A. Natale

I reviewed the changes made and see that they address my concerns. Please create the appropriate pull request and reference this issue.

@matentzn I presume you mean you'd rather that our group decide which domain fits best, as opposed to the submitter? As a long-time database curator, I too (mildly) lean toward...

James O: Some small, upper ontologies are designed to be imported in full: COB, OMO, RO core, BFO.

From OBO Operations meeting 2025-09-30: James O points out that IEDB has a long list of transgenic mice that NCBI won’t add, it is a good idea to link to...

Discussed during Ops call 2025-09-02. Overall there wasn't much concern about this, at least with respect to what's currently on the page. On the other hand, there was no objection...

Since the current definition mentions more than just asparagine, there should be multiple 'consider' used instead of 'replaced_by'.

I was going based on the information in PSI-MOD: [N-glycosylated residue](https://ontobee.org/ontology/MOD?iri=http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/MOD_00006) which shows other amino acids can be N-linked. All are indicated as 'natural'.

Yeah I was a bit confused by that, but figured N-terminal did not rule out N-linked. But I also checked PRO (which contains a very large number of N-linked glycosylated...

I found this paper, describing work on N-linked arginines. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/cellular-and-infection-microbiology/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00185/full

My original comment is only about the use of 'replaced_by' instead of 'consider'. If there is even one type of N-linked glycosylation that is not to asparagine (and according to...