Darren A. Natale

@pfabry we already allow certain exceptions for new ontologies. The ability for individual terms to resolve will just be another that will be added to the exceptions list. Full compliance...

Submitters are already required to use OBO PURL format. What is at issue here is whether or not those PURLs are required to resolve. Here's what's being asked: When an...

From Ops meeting 2025-03-18: A clarification: The 'must-resolve' proposal should pertain only to whatever destination page an OBO PURL specifies. That is, when a term is referenced using an OBO...

Note: We often use backticks for cases where we want to show how something should look in a file. Note: Manchester syntax uses single quotes for term labels; perhaps we...

The current definition of 'complex of molecules': "A complex of two or more molecules that are not covalently bound." Straw man for addition of cardinality as a criterion: "A complex...

Both these files pertained to the previous manual review process. All information is either outdated or better covered elsewhere. I believe all currently-public pages have been purged of links to...

@nlharris see the minutes of the last ops meeting (I believe you were absent). In short, more discussion will happen.

So far as I can recall, these badges were added without vote and thus should never have appeared in the first place. In fact, after searching through the meeting minutes...

Agree that we can't just toss it aside at this point. Sorry if it seemed that I was advocating removing them without vote. I was stating why a vote should...

I view the potential opt-out flag as a separate issue from the vote. So long as the badge is shown, the ability to opt-out should be there. I still think...